First of all grabs the eye ‘s the relatively thin and you will significant way the newest emails are written. The brand new lines of ?, eg, are short one to in-line ten Roberts checks out a ? instead of an ?. In spite of the uncial handwriting, the new ? is not authored instance an investment Latin “M”, but alternatively is much like a couple adjoining “1”s in Latin cursive; this https://kissbrides.com/tr/portekizli-kadinlar/ new crossbar of one’s ? is within the higher 3rd out of this new page. Brand new ?, such as the ?, is extremely odd and you may corresponds to good Latin “V”, given that ? represents an upside down “V”; common expansion of your proper diagonal to the top remaining doesn’t take place. The fresh ? consists of several separate bits. There is an apparent pit between your vertical downstroke and also the one or two diagonals, which can be drawn in that sweep. This kind of the latest ? is obtainable, like, in the an effective psalm fragment about first half of new 8th century, P.Amst. We 21 fourteen . Brand new crossbar of one’s ? created quite high upwards is additionally used in good liturgical calendar throughout the year 535/6, the fresh new P.Oxy. 1357 sixteen . The form of this new ? on that papyrus plus is comparable to the new mode used in P.Ryl. III 470. The latest ? contained in this papyrus, however, weighed against P.Ryl. III 470, is created due to the fact a continuous page. The latest ? in P.Oxy. 1357 have a diagonal stroke to the top remaining, during the fragment P.Ryl. III 470 it is created eg an excellent triangle. The fresh previously mentioned style of the new ?, a comparable type of new ?, the aforementioned-mentioned type of the new ? and you may an enthusiastic ? with also quick shots can also be found within the P.Berol 13269, that is allotted to the fresh 7th/eighth Century 16 . P.Lond. 1817, old regarding the 6th century, nevertheless alternates between the uncial additionally the significantly more than-said particular the ?, and you may similarities into Manchester fragment exist regarding the ? and also the ?, once the pit among them elements of brand new ? for the P. Lond. 1817 is not as high as in P.Ryl. III 470 17 . According to research by the comparative messages quoted, P.Ryl. III, 470 belongs within sixth and 7th many years. The latest fifth century try impractical since the date off provider, but cannot be entirely ruled out. Employing brown ink, of which there’s absolutely no proof ahead of the last century, in addition to activities contained in this advice 18 .
To put it briefly it could be mentioned that an internet dating with the 3rd otherwise fourth century must be regarded as really not very likely
13. At finishes of your shots out-of ?, ?, ?, ?, and you can ? are brief specks of ink that give the text a phony, otherwise, due to the fact Lobel place it, pretty appearance. Having a comparable event within the enchanting messages, cf. p. 7 col. 17; pt ten; p. thirty six col. 2; P. thirty-six Col. eight into the: K. Klassendanz, Papyri Graecae Magicae. Perish griechischen Zauberpapyri (=The latest Greek Enchanting Papyri) II, Stuttgart next ed. 1974.
For paleographic dating, it should be indexed you to definitely majuscule manuscripts, because Roberts themselves writes in his comments, are particularly tough to date
18. I am in financial trouble to H. Harrauer into the discussion. Select plus V. Gardthausen, Griechische Palaographie step 1: Das Buchwesen i will be Altertum und im byzantinischen Mittelalter, Leipzig next ed. 1911, 203-217. He produces (p.205) one to around the fifth century Ad “a brownish, together with metallic ink arrived to have fun with” and you will quotes Schubart inside context when you look at the notice 5 to the exact same webpage, which speaks of a brown-red-ink , that’s available from the papyri regarding last century Post. Meanwhile, the more valuable brown ink was only used in crucial texts.
